<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Victorian costume sketches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sydneypadua.com/2010/06/21/some-victorian-costume-sketches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sydneypadua.com/2010/06/21/some-victorian-costume-sketches/</link>
	<description>portfolio and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lalitte</title>
		<link>http://sydneypadua.com/2010/06/21/some-victorian-costume-sketches/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Lalitte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sydneypadua.com/?p=134#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>1830s - 1860s - yup, a *particularly* hideous age sartorially, and the appearance of new chemical dyes in the 1850s gave ever easier vent to bad taste.  Things only got better in the 70s/80s with the bustle - though I was dismayed to find out, acto one historical account, that the bustle was an insidiously racist+sexist garment - seen at the time as a way of giving white women the supposed generosity of behind  only found in black female slaves.  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1830s &#8211; 1860s &#8211; yup, a *particularly* hideous age sartorially, and the appearance of new chemical dyes in the 1850s gave ever easier vent to bad taste.  Things only got better in the 70s/80s with the bustle &#8211; though I was dismayed to find out, acto one historical account, that the bustle was an insidiously racist+sexist garment &#8211; seen at the time as a way of giving white women the supposed generosity of behind  only found in black female slaves.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

